<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Signals company blog - Google</title>
    <link>http://www.sigblog.com/</link>
    <description>Our views and thoughts on everything online, new media, technology, and design</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Signals</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:46:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>blogs@signals.co.uk</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>blogs@signals.co.uk</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.sigblog.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=b607d47f-5af7-4af0-8c07-57dbea62b8ca</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.sigblog.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.sigblog.com/PermaLink,guid,b607d47f-5af7-4af0-8c07-57dbea62b8ca.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Richard Lawrence</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.sigblog.com/CommentView,guid,b607d47f-5af7-4af0-8c07-57dbea62b8ca.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sigblog.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b607d47f-5af7-4af0-8c07-57dbea62b8ca</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Having used some premium 3d software in
my time, Maya, Lightwave, 3d Studio Max I was somewhat sceptical of using Google Sketchup
7 Pro, i thought it would be incredibly basic.<br /><br />
Instead, I was really impressed - good modelling tools, good control, manipulation
tools, good texture mapping, and best of all quick and easy access to free models. 
<br /><br />
It can import my 3ds files and export again in 3ds, ready to re-import into the leading
online 3d engine - Unity 3d.<br /><br />
I'm looking forward to playing some more.<br /><br />
http://sketchup.google.com/intl/en/<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.sigblog.com/aggbug.ashx?id=b607d47f-5af7-4af0-8c07-57dbea62b8ca" /></body>
      <title>Google Sketch Up</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sigblog.com/PermaLink,guid,b607d47f-5af7-4af0-8c07-57dbea62b8ca.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.sigblog.com/2010/06/01/GoogleSketchUp.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Having used some premium 3d software in my time, Maya, Lightwave, 3d Studio Max I was somewhat sceptical of using Google Sketchup 7 Pro, i thought it would be incredibly basic.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Instead, I was really impressed - good modelling tools, good control, manipulation
tools, good texture mapping, and best of all quick and easy access to free models. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It can import my 3ds files and export again in 3ds, ready to re-import into the leading
online 3d engine - Unity 3d.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm looking forward to playing some more.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
http://sketchup.google.com/intl/en/&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.sigblog.com/aggbug.ashx?id=b607d47f-5af7-4af0-8c07-57dbea62b8ca" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.sigblog.com/CommentView,guid,b607d47f-5af7-4af0-8c07-57dbea62b8ca.aspx</comments>
      <category>Animation</category>
      <category>Design</category>
      <category>Google</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.sigblog.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=b47bcee2-dff5-43be-8163-2ce02cda8098</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.sigblog.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.sigblog.com/PermaLink,guid,b47bcee2-dff5-43be-8163-2ce02cda8098.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scott Airth</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.sigblog.com/CommentView,guid,b47bcee2-dff5-43be-8163-2ce02cda8098.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sigblog.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b47bcee2-dff5-43be-8163-2ce02cda8098</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">After <a href="http://www.sigblog.com/PermaLink,guid,dcef6ba2-7a52-4dfb-baf8-98e2e324f576.aspx">launching</a> their
new browser <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Chrome</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> have
experienced a less than stellar start in the browser space after <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1858">several
vulnerabilities</a> and proof of concept attacks have left them with a little egg
on their face.  Never mind, it's in beta which leaves them with some excuse to
fall back on.  I do however find some of the flaws slightly surprising in that
they identical to the ones <a href="http://www.apple.com/">Apple</a> suffered with
their <a href="http://webkit.org/">WebKit</a>, which <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Chrome</a> 'borrowed'.  
Lesson learned yet?<br /><br />
- Scott<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.sigblog.com/aggbug.ashx?id=b47bcee2-dff5-43be-8163-2ce02cda8098" /></body>
      <title>Chrome gets slightly tarnished</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sigblog.com/PermaLink,guid,b47bcee2-dff5-43be-8163-2ce02cda8098.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.sigblog.com/2008/09/05/ChromeGetsSlightlyTarnished.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>After &lt;a href="http://www.sigblog.com/PermaLink,guid,dcef6ba2-7a52-4dfb-baf8-98e2e324f576.aspx"&gt;launching&lt;/a&gt; their
new browser &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"&gt;Chrome&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.google.com"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; have
experienced a less than stellar start in the browser space after &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1858"&gt;several
vulnerabilities&lt;/a&gt; and proof of concept attacks have left them with a little egg
on their face.&amp;nbsp; Never mind, it's in beta which leaves them with some excuse to
fall back on.&amp;nbsp; I do however find some of the flaws slightly surprising in that
they identical to the ones &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/"&gt;Apple&lt;/a&gt; suffered with
their &lt;a href="http://webkit.org/"&gt;WebKit&lt;/a&gt;, which &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"&gt;Chrome&lt;/a&gt; 'borrowed'.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
Lesson learned yet?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
- Scott&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.sigblog.com/aggbug.ashx?id=b47bcee2-dff5-43be-8163-2ce02cda8098" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.sigblog.com/CommentView,guid,b47bcee2-dff5-43be-8163-2ce02cda8098.aspx</comments>
      <category>Apple</category>
      <category>Google</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.sigblog.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=dcef6ba2-7a52-4dfb-baf8-98e2e324f576</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.sigblog.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.sigblog.com/PermaLink,guid,dcef6ba2-7a52-4dfb-baf8-98e2e324f576.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scott Airth</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.sigblog.com/CommentView,guid,dcef6ba2-7a52-4dfb-baf8-98e2e324f576.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.sigblog.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=dcef6ba2-7a52-4dfb-baf8-98e2e324f576</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Forgive me for sounding less than enthusiastic
after <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/fresh-take-on-browser.html">announced</a> their
long awaited <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">browser</a> called <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Chrome</a>.  <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> have
released under the fabled beta tag and you can now <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">download</a> and
use it.  It's a multi-platform (Windows, OSX &amp; *Nix) open source browser
(good for some), which has borrowed quite a bit from <a href="http://www.apple.com/">Apple's</a><a href="http://webkit.org/">WebKit</a> and
unsurprisingly <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/">Mozilla's</a><a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/">Firefox</a>.<br /><br />
Initial use of the browser would indicate a similar speed to <a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/">Firefox</a>,
and sometimes faster with JS, but some sites can be slower than you are used to. 
Of course to differentiate themselves from other browsers, chrome have brought some
new idea's to the table like process isolation per tab (surprised this doesn't already
exist in others), and all in one search/address bar.<br /><br />
Will I switch? Probably not as I love all my extensions in <a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/">Firefox</a> like <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865">Adblock</a>,
mouse <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/39">gestures</a>, <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/search?q=firebug&amp;cat=all">firebug</a> that
are just not available for chrome.   What it does however mean for me and
other web developer is yet another browser that we have to support/test for. 
I now make it 5 major ones with <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/default.mspx">Internet
Explorer</a>, <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/">Firefox</a>, <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">Safari</a>, <a href="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a> and
now <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Chrome</a>. And of course Internet Explorer
6, 7 and 8 as companies are so stubborn (and security lapsed) to bother upgrade it.<br /><br />
What does it mean for <a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/">Firefox</a> though?  <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/">Mozilla</a> recently <a href="http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/08/26/firefox-summit-reflections/">announced</a> an
extension of their deal with <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> who pays <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/">Mozilla</a> a
substantial sum.  In 2006 alone the total amounted to around $57 million, around
85% of the company's total revenue. The deal was originally going to expire in 2006,
but was later extended to 2008 and will now run through 2011.  Imagine if you
will Chrome taking enough market share from <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/default.mspx">Internet
Explorer</a> and <a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/">Firefox</a>,
they could invariably sever their deal with <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/">Mozilla</a> leaving
them struggling for operating costs.<br /><br />
- Scott<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.sigblog.com/aggbug.ashx?id=dcef6ba2-7a52-4dfb-baf8-98e2e324f576" /></body>
      <title>Oh god, another browser!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sigblog.com/PermaLink,guid,dcef6ba2-7a52-4dfb-baf8-98e2e324f576.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.sigblog.com/2008/09/02/OhGodAnotherBrowser.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:06:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Forgive me for sounding less than enthusiastic after &lt;a href="http://www.google.com"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/fresh-take-on-browser.html"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; their
long awaited &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"&gt;browser&lt;/a&gt; called &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"&gt;Chrome&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.google.com"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; have
released under the fabled beta tag and you can now &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"&gt;download&lt;/a&gt; and
use it.&amp;nbsp; It's a multi-platform (Windows, OSX &amp;amp; *Nix) open source browser
(good for some), which has borrowed quite a bit from &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/"&gt;Apple's&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://webkit.org/"&gt;WebKit&lt;/a&gt; and
unsurprisingly &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla.org/"&gt;Mozilla's&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/"&gt;Firefox&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Initial use of the browser would indicate a similar speed to &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/"&gt;Firefox&lt;/a&gt;,
and sometimes faster with JS, but some sites can be slower than you are used to.&amp;nbsp;
Of course to differentiate themselves from other browsers, chrome have brought some
new idea's to the table like process isolation per tab (surprised this doesn't already
exist in others), and all in one search/address bar.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Will I switch? Probably not as I love all my extensions in &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/"&gt;Firefox&lt;/a&gt; like &lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865"&gt;Adblock&lt;/a&gt;,
mouse &lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/39"&gt;gestures&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/search?q=firebug&amp;amp;cat=all"&gt;firebug&lt;/a&gt; that
are just not available for chrome.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; What it does however mean for me and
other web developer is yet another browser that we have to support/test for.&amp;nbsp;
I now make it 5 major ones with &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/default.mspx"&gt;Internet
Explorer&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/"&gt;Firefox&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/"&gt;Safari&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.opera.com/"&gt;Opera&lt;/a&gt; and
now &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"&gt;Chrome&lt;/a&gt;. And of course Internet Explorer
6, 7 and 8 as companies are so stubborn (and security lapsed) to bother upgrade it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What does it mean for &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/"&gt;Firefox&lt;/a&gt; though?&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla.org/"&gt;Mozilla&lt;/a&gt; recently &lt;a href="http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/08/26/firefox-summit-reflections/"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; an
extension of their deal with &lt;a href="http://www.google.com"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; who pays &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla.org/"&gt;Mozilla&lt;/a&gt; a
substantial sum.&amp;nbsp; In 2006 alone the total amounted to around $57 million, around
85% of the company's total revenue. The deal was originally going to expire in 2006,
but was later extended to 2008 and will now run through 2011.&amp;nbsp; Imagine if you
will Chrome taking enough market share from &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/default.mspx"&gt;Internet
Explorer&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/"&gt;Firefox&lt;/a&gt;,
they could invariably sever their deal with &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla.org/"&gt;Mozilla&lt;/a&gt; leaving
them struggling for operating costs.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
- Scott&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.sigblog.com/aggbug.ashx?id=dcef6ba2-7a52-4dfb-baf8-98e2e324f576" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.sigblog.com/CommentView,guid,dcef6ba2-7a52-4dfb-baf8-98e2e324f576.aspx</comments>
      <category>Firefox</category>
      <category>Mozilla</category>
      <category>Google</category>
      <category>Internet Explorer</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
      <category>Apple</category>
      <category>Safari</category>
      <category>Opera</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>